Last Name 1Students NameProfessors NameCourse NumberDateCritical Thinking in Life and Death SituationIntroductionThis paper aims to evaluate the article Critical Thinking in a Life and Death Situation byMark Battersby. The paper will commence by introducing the arguments from the article instandard form, which will be followed by an explanation of the premises and an evaluation basedon the ARG arguments. A conclusion will ultimately be provided based on the findings from theevaluation.Argument OneIn any kind of fatal diagnosis where patients sentenced to death by their doctors due to lack of acure for their disease, there are always outlivers who survive such sentencing. The main reasonswhy they outlive death sentencing diseases is because:Standard form:Premises:1. They are well taken care of.2. They have a positive attitude3. Their condition might have been misdiagnosedConclusionThus, reasonable doubt can be a cause of hope.Explanation of the Premises:Last Name 2The author says that those who have outlived chronic diseases have done so due tohaving some doubt, which gave them hope to fight the illness and live more years than they hadbeen anticip ...
To Order an Original Plagiarism Free Paper on the Same Topic Click Here
Other samples, services and questions:
When you use PaperHelp, you save one valuable — TIME
You can spend it for more important things than paper writing.