I will pay for the following article Case 3: Time Value of Money and Capital Budgeting. The work is to be 3 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page. The PV of the negative cash flow = 1,722,000. Therefore, the MIRR = {5,430,732/1,722,000}^1/6 – 1 = 21.1 %.
The firm should adopt project B. The supporting argument is that comparatively, project B has a positive NPV while project A has a negative NPV. A positive NPV is an indication of a possible future growth and financial stability. Therefore, investors who wish to create wealth should consider undertaking project B. The second reason for preferring project B is that the IRR is greater than the cost of capital. That is 36.67 % >. 8.5 %. The IRR is used to determine whether an investment would generate high returns to facilitate the payment of interest on cost of finance (Marx 212-289).
The amount to be drawn after retirement is $ 3000 per month (12*3,000) = $ 36,000 per annum. The expected life span after retirement is 20 years. Therefore, the requirement is to save (36,000*20) = $ 720,000 in a period of 35 years before retiring in order to meet my expenditure level of 36,000 per annum.
