Running head: 4 CASE ANALYSIS1Four Case AnalysisStudent NameReg. NoInstructorSubmission Date4 CASE ANALYSIS24 Case AnalysisCase 1: The FloodIn this case, Phil and Linda should aim at working with the old-timer employees ratherthan ignoring their insistences that they had filled in their duties faithfully. For one, the oldtimers have been essential parts of the firm as demonstrated by their extensive knowledge oftheir jobs. In fact, the lack of clear job descriptions had arisen from how well they had performedin their jobs the entire time before the floods. As such, despite the feeling that they wereexaggerating their job descriptions, ignoring these essential parts of the company would, ineffect, be a misguided decision on the part of Phil and Linda as the owner and consultantrespectively. Essentially, both should consider the involvement of the old-timers in delineatingthe various job descriptions as an approach to resolving the differences. Indeed, these old-timeremployees have been the ones completing these said jobs for the entire period before and basedon their performance; they undoubtedly know what these jobs entail as well as the necessaryassociated skills for the jobs. Ultimately, the involvement of the old timers in the making of thesedescriptions will, in effect, serve in affording them the feeling of importance in the company asthey have always felt before the need for new workers. The old-timers will, therefore, completetheir job de ...
To Order an Original Plagiarism Free Paper on the Same Topic Click Here
Other samples, services and questions:
When you use PaperHelp, you save one valuable — TIME
You can spend it for more important things than paper writing.
