None

Essay Two PHIL101: Introduction to Philosophy 

 

In Section III of the course, we have considered the question of what constitutes rational belief in 

the context of religious belief. We have seen a variety of views relevant to both epistemic and 

pragmatic rational belief. Here†™ s a chart showing how the views that we†™ ve encountered stack up: 

Author Epistemically Rational? Pragmatically Rational? 

Aquinas Yes n/a1

 

Hick Not necessarily not2

 n/a 

Feuerbach3

 Traditional view: No 

Humanist view: Yes 

Traditional view: No 

Humanist view: Yes 

 

In order to solidify your understanding of these concepts, and to gain some practice in 

philosophical argumentation, your task is to write an argumentative essay drawing a conclusion 

about the rationality of religious belief. The primary resources for your discussion should be our 

authors in Section III. 

 

Do†™ s and Don†™ t†™ s: 

– Do make clear what is your thesis. Your thesis should be a claim about the rationality of 

religious belief. Note that this is not the same as making a claim about the existence of 

God, though obviously that matter may be related. Your focus should be on the criteria 

for rational belief and what it is rational believe. So: 

– Do make specific reference to the definition of rational belief from the Introduction to 

Section III (Lesson III.1). And further: 

– Do make clear whether you are talking about epistemic rationality or pragmatic 

rationality and apply the appropriate definition. Remember that the former concerns 

evidence for truth and the latter concerns the benefit (or harm) of belief. So, if you†™ re 

arguing about epistemic rationality, then your focus should be on evidence for or against 

God†™ s existence; and if you†™ re arguing about pragmatic rationality, then you should be 

talking about the benefits or harms of religious belief. 

– Do use our authors from this section. If you agree with one or more of them, then say 

why. Don†™ t simply assume that your author is correct: you must evaluate his thought. 

Similarly, if you disagree with one of our authors, then you must say why you think his 

thought incorrect. 

– Note, too, that our authors themselves don†™ t directly address the question of rational 

belief. You will have to consider what their remarks imply where rational belief is 

concerned. 

– Do explain yourself thoroughly to your reader. Don†™ t assume any specialized knowledge 

on the part of your reader. 

– I don†™ t recommend using other resources than those available in our textbook. – Don†™ t get carried away. Feelings tend to run strong where religious belief is concerned. 

Keep yours in check. 

– Remember, finally, that this is a writing exercise – not the final word on the matter. Keep 

your goals modest so that you can execute a clear, cohesive essay. 

 

Officially: 

– Due Monday, June 30, midnight, via Turnitin.com. 

– Maximum 750 words; include a word-count in your heading. 

– Double-spaced 

– Use proper in-text citation format 

– It†™ s a formal essay, so proper grammar, spelling, and tone, please. 

 

 

 

 

LET ME KNOW IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS. 

 

 

 

 1

 n/a = the author†™ s remarks don†™ t address this question 2

 Hick seeks to show that the argument from evil fails to show that religious belief is epistemically 

irrational. His argument, if it succeeds, shows only that it is possible that the existence of evil is 

compatible with that of God. Hence, his argument shows not that religious belief is epistemically rational, 

but only that it might be. This is, still, a significant finding, given the intent of the argument from evil. 3

 And note that Feuerbach considered two views. The traditional view, he thinks, is both illogical and 

harmful to us, while the humanist view that he recommends, he thinks, is both logical and beneficial. 

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.


The post Philosophy (not Psychology) appeared first on Topnursingtutors.com.

 

"Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now"

Essay Two PHIL101: Introduction to Philosophy 

 

In Section III of the course, we have considered the question of what constitutes rational belief in 

the context of religious belief. We have seen a variety of views relevant to both epistemic and 

pragmatic rational belief. Here†™ s a chart showing how the views that we†™ ve encountered stack up: 

Author Epistemically Rational? Pragmatically Rational? 

Aquinas Yes n/a1

 

Hick Not necessarily not2

 n/a 

Feuerbach3

 Traditional view: No 

Humanist view: Yes 

Traditional view: No 

Humanist view: Yes 

 

In order to solidify your understanding of these concepts, and to gain some practice in 

philosophical argumentation, your task is to write an argumentative essay drawing a conclusion 

about the rationality of religious belief. The primary resources for your discussion should be our 

authors in Section III. 

 

Do†™ s and Don†™ t†™ s: 

– Do make clear what is your thesis. Your thesis should be a claim about the rationality of 

religious belief. Note that this is not the same as making a claim about the existence of 

God, though obviously that matter may be related. Your focus should be on the criteria 

for rational belief and what it is rational believe. So: 

– Do make specific reference to the definition of rational belief from the Introduction to 

Section III (Lesson III.1). And further: 

– Do make clear whether you are talking about epistemic rationality or pragmatic 

rationality and apply the appropriate definition. Remember that the former concerns 

evidence for truth and the latter concerns the benefit (or harm) of belief. So, if you†™ re 

arguing about epistemic rationality, then your focus should be on evidence for or against 

God†™ s existence; and if you†™ re arguing about pragmatic rationality, then you should be 

talking about the benefits or harms of religious belief. 

– Do use our authors from this section. If you agree with one or more of them, then say 

why. Don†™ t simply assume that your author is correct: you must evaluate his thought. 

Similarly, if you disagree with one of our authors, then you must say why you think his 

thought incorrect. 

– Note, too, that our authors themselves don†™ t directly address the question of rational 

belief. You will have to consider what their remarks imply where rational belief is 

concerned. 

– Do explain yourself thoroughly to your reader. Don†™ t assume any specialized knowledge 

on the part of your reader. 

– I don†™ t recommend using other resources than those available in our textbook. – Don†™ t get carried away. Feelings tend to run strong where religious belief is concerned. 

Keep yours in check. 

– Remember, finally, that this is a writing exercise – not the final word on the matter. Keep 

your goals modest so that you can execute a clear, cohesive essay. 

 

Officially: 

– Due Monday, June 30, midnight, via Turnitin.com. 

– Maximum 750 words; include a word-count in your heading. 

– Double-spaced 

– Use proper in-text citation format 

– It†™ s a formal essay, so proper grammar, spelling, and tone, please. 

 

 

 

 

LET ME KNOW IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS. 

 

 

 

 1

 n/a = the author†™ s remarks don†™ t address this question 2

 Hick seeks to show that the argument from evil fails to show that religious belief is epistemically 

irrational. His argument, if it succeeds, shows only that it is possible that the existence of evil is 

compatible with that of God. Hence, his argument shows not that religious belief is epistemically rational, 

but only that it might be. This is, still, a significant finding, given the intent of the argument from evil. 3

 And note that Feuerbach considered two views. The traditional view, he thinks, is both illogical and 

harmful to us, while the humanist view that he recommends, he thinks, is both logical and beneficial. 

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.


The post Philosophy (not Psychology) appeared first on Topnursingtutors.com.

 

"Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now"

Essay Two PHIL101: Introduction to Philosophy 

 

In Section III of the course, we have considered the question of what constitutes rational belief in 

the context of religious belief. We have seen a variety of views relevant to both epistemic and 

pragmatic rational belief. Here†™ s a chart showing how the views that we†™ ve encountered stack up: 

Author Epistemically Rational? Pragmatically Rational? 

Aquinas Yes n/a1

 

Hick Not necessarily not2

 n/a 

Feuerbach3

 Traditional view: No 

Humanist view: Yes 

Traditional view: No 

Humanist view: Yes 

 

In order to solidify your understanding of these concepts, and to gain some practice in 

philosophical argumentation, your task is to write an argumentative essay drawing a conclusion 

about the rationality of religious belief. The primary resources for your discussion should be our 

authors in Section III. 

 

Do†™ s and Don†™ t†™ s: 

– Do make clear what is your thesis. Your thesis should be a claim about the rationality of 

religious belief. Note that this is not the same as making a claim about the existence of 

God, though obviously that matter may be related. Your focus should be on the criteria 

for rational belief and what it is rational believe. So: 

– Do make specific reference to the definition of rational belief from the Introduction to 

Section III (Lesson III.1). And further: 

– Do make clear whether you are talking about epistemic rationality or pragmatic 

rationality and apply the appropriate definition. Remember that the former concerns 

evidence for truth and the latter concerns the benefit (or harm) of belief. So, if you†™ re 

arguing about epistemic rationality, then your focus should be on evidence for or against 

God†™ s existence; and if you†™ re arguing about pragmatic rationality, then you should be 

talking about the benefits or harms of religious belief. 

– Do use our authors from this section. If you agree with one or more of them, then say 

why. Don†™ t simply assume that your author is correct: you must evaluate his thought. 

Similarly, if you disagree with one of our authors, then you must say why you think his 

thought incorrect. 

– Note, too, that our authors themselves don†™ t directly address the question of rational 

belief. You will have to consider what their remarks imply where rational belief is 

concerned. 

– Do explain yourself thoroughly to your reader. Don†™ t assume any specialized knowledge 

on the part of your reader. 

– I don†™ t recommend using other resources than those available in our textbook. – Don†™ t get carried away. Feelings tend to run strong where religious belief is concerned. 

Keep yours in check. 

– Remember, finally, that this is a writing exercise – not the final word on the matter. Keep 

your goals modest so that you can execute a clear, cohesive essay. 

 

Officially: 

– Due Monday, June 30, midnight, via Turnitin.com. 

– Maximum 750 words; include a word-count in your heading. 

– Double-spaced 

– Use proper in-text citation format 

– It†™ s a formal essay, so proper grammar, spelling, and tone, please. 

 

 

 

 

LET ME KNOW IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS. 

 

 

 

 1

 n/a = the author†™ s remarks don†™ t address this question 2

 Hick seeks to show that the argument from evil fails to show that religious belief is epistemically 

irrational. His argument, if it succeeds, shows only that it is possible that the existence of evil is 

compatible with that of God. Hence, his argument shows not that religious belief is epistemically rational, 

but only that it might be. This is, still, a significant finding, given the intent of the argument from evil. 3

 And note that Feuerbach considered two views. The traditional view, he thinks, is both illogical and 

harmful to us, while the humanist view that he recommends, he thinks, is both logical and beneficial. 

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.


The post Philosophy (not Psychology) appeared first on Topnursingtutors.com.

 

"Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now"

Essay Two PHIL101: Introduction to Philosophy 

 

In Section III of the course, we have considered the question of what constitutes rational belief in 

the context of religious belief. We have seen a variety of views relevant to both epistemic and 

pragmatic rational belief. Here†™ s a chart showing how the views that we†™ ve encountered stack up: 

Author Epistemically Rational? Pragmatically Rational? 

Aquinas Yes n/a1

 

Hick Not necessarily not2

 n/a 

Feuerbach3

 Traditional view: No 

Humanist view: Yes 

Traditional view: No 

Humanist view: Yes 

 

In order to solidify your understanding of these concepts, and to gain some practice in 

philosophical argumentation, your task is to write an argumentative essay drawing a conclusion 

about the rationality of religious belief. The primary resources for your discussion should be our 

authors in Section III. 

 

Do†™ s and Don†™ t†™ s: 

– Do make clear what is your thesis. Your thesis should be a claim about the rationality of 

religious belief. Note that this is not the same as making a claim about the existence of 

God, though obviously that matter may be related. Your focus should be on the criteria 

for rational belief and what it is rational believe. So: 

– Do make specific reference to the definition of rational belief from the Introduction to 

Section III (Lesson III.1). And further: 

– Do make clear whether you are talking about epistemic rationality or pragmatic 

rationality and apply the appropriate definition. Remember that the former concerns 

evidence for truth and the latter concerns the benefit (or harm) of belief. So, if you†™ re 

arguing about epistemic rationality, then your focus should be on evidence for or against 

God†™ s existence; and if you†™ re arguing about pragmatic rationality, then you should be 

talking about the benefits or harms of religious belief. 

– Do use our authors from this section. If you agree with one or more of them, then say 

why. Don†™ t simply assume that your author is correct: you must evaluate his thought. 

Similarly, if you disagree with one of our authors, then you must say why you think his 

thought incorrect. 

– Note, too, that our authors themselves don†™ t directly address the question of rational 

belief. You will have to consider what their remarks imply where rational belief is 

concerned. 

– Do explain yourself thoroughly to your reader. Don†™ t assume any specialized knowledge 

on the part of your reader. 

– I don†™ t recommend using other resources than those available in our textbook. – Don†™ t get carried away. Feelings tend to run strong where religious belief is concerned. 

Keep yours in check. 

– Remember, finally, that this is a writing exercise – not the final word on the matter. Keep 

your goals modest so that you can execute a clear, cohesive essay. 

 

Officially: 

– Due Monday, June 30, midnight, via Turnitin.com. 

– Maximum 750 words; include a word-count in your heading. 

– Double-spaced 

– Use proper in-text citation format 

– It†™ s a formal essay, so proper grammar, spelling, and tone, please. 

 

 

 

 

LET ME KNOW IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS. 

 

 

 

 1

 n/a = the author†™ s remarks don†™ t address this question 2

 Hick seeks to show that the argument from evil fails to show that religious belief is epistemically 

irrational. His argument, if it succeeds, shows only that it is possible that the existence of evil is 

compatible with that of God. Hence, his argument shows not that religious belief is epistemically rational, 

but only that it might be. This is, still, a significant finding, given the intent of the argument from evil. 3

 And note that Feuerbach considered two views. The traditional view, he thinks, is both illogical and 

harmful to us, while the humanist view that he recommends, he thinks, is both logical and beneficial. 

Essay Two PHIL101: Introduction to Philosophy 

 

In Section III of the course, we have considered the question of what constitutes rational belief in 

the context of religious belief. We have seen a variety of views relevant to both epistemic and 

pragmatic rational belief. Here†™ s a chart showing how the views that we†™ ve encountered stack up: 

™ ™ ™ ™

Author Epistemically Rational? Pragmatically Rational? 

Aquinas Yes n/a1

 

Hick Not necessarily not2

 n/a 

Feuerbach3

 Traditional view: No 

Humanist view: Yes 

Traditional view: No 

Humanist view: Yes 

 

In order to solidify your understanding of these concepts, and to gain some practice in 

philosophical argumentation, your task is to write an argumentative essay drawing a conclusion 

about the rationality of religious belief. The primary resources for your discussion should be our 

authors in Section III. 

 

Do†™ s and Don†™ t†™ s: 

™ ™ ™ ™ ™ ™

– Do make clear what is your thesis. Your thesis should be a claim about the rationality of 

religious belief. Note that this is not the same as making a claim about the existence of 

God, though obviously that matter may be related. Your focus should be on the criteria 

for rational belief and what it is rational believe. So: 

– Do make specific reference to the definition of rational belief from the Introduction to 

Section III (Lesson III.1). And further: 

– Do make clear whether you are talking about epistemic rationality or pragmatic 

rationality and apply the appropriate definition. Remember that the former concerns 

evidence for truth and the latter concerns the benefit (or harm) of belief. So, if you†™ re 

™ ™

arguing about epistemic rationality, then your focus should be on evidence for or against 

God†™ s existence; and if you†™ re arguing about pragmatic rationality, then you should be 

™ ™ ™ ™

talking about the benefits or harms of religious belief. 

– Do use our authors from this section. If you agree with one or more of them, then say 

why. Don†™ t simply assume that your author is correct: you must evaluate his thought. 

™ ™

Similarly, if you disagree with one of our authors, then you must say why you think his 

thought incorrect. 

– Note, too, that our authors themselves don†™ t directly address the question of rational 

™ ™

belief. You will have to consider what their remarks imply where rational belief is 

concerned. 

– Do explain yourself thoroughly to your reader. Don†™ t assume any specialized knowledge 

™ ™

on the part of your reader. 

– I don†™ t recommend using other resources than those available in our textbook. – Don†™ t get carried away. Feelings tend to run strong where religious belief is concerned. 

™ ™ ™ ™

Keep yours in check. 

– Remember, finally, that this is a writing exercise – not the final word on the matter. Keep 

your goals modest so that you can execute a clear, cohesive essay. 

 

Officially: 

– Due Monday, June 30, midnight, via Turnitin.com. 

– Maximum 750 words; include a word-count in your heading. 

– Double-spaced 

– Use proper in-text citation format 

– It†™ s a formal essay, so proper grammar, spelling, and tone, please. 

™ ™

 

 

 

 

LET ME KNOW IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS. 

 

 

 

 1

 n/a = the author†™ s remarks don†™ t address this question 2

™ ™ ™ ™

 Hick seeks to show that the argument from evil fails to show that religious belief is epistemically 

irrational. His argument, if it succeeds, shows only that it is possible that the existence of evil is 

compatible with that of God. Hence, his argument shows not that religious belief is epistemically rational, 

but only that it might be. This is, still, a significant finding, given the intent of the argument from evil. 3

 And note that Feuerbach considered two views. The traditional view, he thinks, is both illogical and 

harmful to us, while the humanist view that he recommends, he thinks, is both logical and beneficial. 

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.



The post Philosophy (not Psychology) appeared first on Topnursingtutors.com.

"Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now"

Answers

Related Questions

Business : The Reorder point system...

The forecasted annual demand for their premium leather jacket is 2,0000.The order-processing cost per order is $40, and the inventory holding cost is...

Programming : IT Strategy and Policy: explain the...

Q1. In your own words, explain the difference between IT Strategy, Tactics, and Operations.  Why is it important to understand the differences?  Wh...

History : Free writings of 5 videos...

You are required to write about the bellow and achieve the goals under each: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>...

Business Law : Need law help with Muruku Co. Ltd b...

Muruku Co. Ltd is a food supplier to a large of retail supermarket known Giagantic Co. Ltd (the supermarket). Muruku Co Ltd was approached by the supe...

Business Finance : Strategic Plan and Self Reflec...

Review the initial scenario and the Strategic Business Plan presented in Module 1 to make sure that the requirements of the Board and the Part II Stra...

Philosophy : Hello are you going to answer the que...

. List the premises and conclusion of the following argument, restating any rhetorical questions as declarative sentences and any emotive language in...

Philosophy : I. List the premises and conclusion o...

Lack of money is not the problem with public schools. Just the opposite: the more they get, the worse they become. Since the schools in Washington, D....

Humanities : Serious TUTOR ONLY! PHILOSOPHY PAPER...

This is the instructions. Please read it carefully or you will not be paid at all because you did not read and understand the assignment fully. If you...

Accounting : Computing Average Unit Costs...

Computing Average Unit CostsThe total monthly operating costs of Chili To Go are:$8,000+ $0.30XwhereX = servings of chili(a) Determine the average cos...

Computer Science : This is the requirements ( case...

cape stone case study.doc This is the requirements ( case study is in the file) 15 hours.The success of any IT project depends on clearly understandi...

Communications : I need an answer for this by 2 o&...

Assume you are the IT manager for an organization tasked with evaluating whether or not to deploy internal wireless access for employees. Write a thre...

English : Farewell to manzanar essay...

 Put yourself in Manzanar. Choose one of the settings from Farewell to Manzanar ­such as the bus, the barracks, or the communal bathroom ­ and writ...

Business : final 640...

Managerial Decision Making Research and Analysis Research a specific company of your choice and identify some of the managerial decisions that were ma...

Humanities : Too Young to Know Better...

Read the article To Young to know better.doc which describes the potential use of brain imaging scanners to determine the level of a criminal offende...

History : 3 to 4 page essay on the following quest...

The 18th century witnessed a great transformation as the colonies and colonial citizens established new cultures and lifestyles. What were these chang...

Humanities : Develop a PowerPoint Presentation an...

You have been asked by your administrator to develop a PowerPoint presentation and supporting paper, for the staff that will give concrete examples, s...

Health & Medical : Market Segments in Healthcare...

The U.S. population continues to diversify, increase in average age (primarily due to baby boomers), and to be influenced by national legislation (e.g...

English : Research paper of Shakespeare's Othe...

Essay must be at least 6 pages long with one primary source and from five to seven secondary scholarly sources. Follow MLA format and be sure to have...

Humanities : Create the 6pages magazine(Include c...

Create 6pages magazine (include cover page and I've already created the cover page.) Check the attachment. Highlighting area news, food, music, ar...

Business Finance : carrabus medical center Swot a...

I created a swot analysis that was suppose to address the following questions:Why is the hospital considering this additional service?Does the hospita...

Political Science : to what extend does incarcerat...

Topic: how incarceration disproportionately affect transgender community that put them at the risk of economic survivalExtra Information: Each student...

Business Finance : Outline and IP...

This is two assignments: an outline of below and then the actual assignment completed below. Deliverable Length: 3 tabs of the Excel file should be c...

Programming : using python with database....

Hello, I attached the assignment. please read it carefully.Note: please, I need at least 4 tables in the DBMS in Microsoft Access. Note: You decide wh...

Philosophy : Philosophy practice questions...

I have attached a file consisting a list of 20 philosophy/religion questions. I am having an extremely difficult time in this course and this would be...

If you didn't find the right answer

Ask Your Questions, We'll notify you once someone answers it