We’ve all had experiences where we have been frustrated by a
decision that our supervisor made. You have probably blamed this
decision on your boss being “closed-minded,†“stubborn,†or
“pigheaded.†But after reading the background materials you
should be able to more precisely examine and define the precise
decision-making biases or pitfalls that your supervisor made.
For this assignment, think of three bad decisions that your
current or past supervisors made. For each decision, explain what
bias discussed in the background materials likely led to this bad
decision. You must use biases specifically discussed in Bolland and
Fletcher (2012); Kourdi (2003); or Hammond, Keeney, and Raiffa
(2008). For each of the three decisions, include:
A) A brief description of the decision and why you think it
was a bad one
B) What kind of bias you think lead to this decision, and why
C) A reference to one of the background readings from this
module
Finally, conclude your paper with a discussion about which of
the three readings from the background materials would be most
useful for your supervisor to read in order to help make better
decisions and avoid biases. Explain why you think this reading
would be more useful than the other two readings.
The paper should be 2–3 pages in length.
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality
paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing
Discount!Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do
not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper
exclusively for you.
"Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"
Other samples, services and questions:
When you use PaperHelp, you save one valuable — TIME
You can spend it for more important things than paper writing.
