Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim Healthcare organizations continually seek to optimize healthcare performance. For years, this approach was a three-pronged one known as the Triple Aim, with efforts focused on improved population health, enhanced patient experience, and lower healthcare costs. More recently, this approach has evolved to a Quadruple Aim by including a focus on improving the work life of healthcare providers. Each of these measures are impacted by decisions made at the organizational level, and organizations have increasingly turned to EBP to inform and justify these decisions. To Prepare: · Read the articles by Sikka, Morath, & Leape (2015); Crabtree, Brennan, Davis, & Coyle (2016); and Kim et al. (2016) provided in the Resources. · Reflect on how EBP might impact (or not impact) the Quadruple Aim in healthcare. · Consider the impact that EBP may have on factors impacting these quadruple aim elements, such as preventable medical errors or healthcare delivery. To Complete: Write a brief analysis (no longer than 2 pages) of the connection between EBP and the Quadruple Aim. Your analysis should address how EBP might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim, including each of the four measures of: · Patient experience · Population health · Costs · Work life of healthcare providers Name: NURS_6052_Module01_Week01_Assignment_Rubric     Excellent Good Fair Poor   Write a brief analysis of the connection between   evidence-based practice and the Quadruple Aim. Your analysis should address   how evidence-based practice might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple   Aim, including each of the four measures of:   ·   Patient experience ·   Population health ·   Costs ·   Work life of healthcare providers 77 (77%) – 85 (85%) The analysis clearly   and accurately addresses in detail how evidence-based practice either   supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.     The analysis accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the four   measures of patient experience, population health, costs, and work-life of   healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.     The analysis provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two   outside resources reviewed on the four measures supporting or not supporting   the Quadruple Aim. The response fully integrates at least two outside   resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the   analysis provided with credible and detailed examples. 68 (68%) – 76 (76%) The analysis   accurately addresses how evidence-based practice either supports or does not   support the Quadruple Aim.     The analysis accurately explains how the four measures of patient experience,   population health, and work life of healthcare providers either supports or   does not support the Quadruple Aim.     The analysis provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource   reviewed on the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim.   The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and two or three   course-specific resources that may support the analysis provided and may   include some detailed examples. 60 (60%) – 67 (67%) The analysis   inaccurately or vaguely addresses how evidence-based practice either supports   or does not support the Quadruple Aim.     The analysis inaccurately or vaguely explains how the four measures of   patient experience, population health, and work life of healthcare providers   either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.     The analysis provides an inaccurate or vague analysis of the four measures   supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim with a vague or inaccurate   analysis of outside resources. The response minimally integrates resources   that may support the analysis provided and may include vague or inaccurate examples. 0 (0%) – 59 (59%) The analysis   inaccurately and vaguely addresses how evidence-based practice either   supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim or is missing.     The analysis inaccurately and vaguely explains how the four measures of   patient experience, population health, and work life of healthcare providers   either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim or is missing.     The analysis provides a vague and inaccurate analysis of the four measures   supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim with a vague and inaccurate   analysis of outside resources. The response fails to integrate any resources   to support the analysis provided or is missing.   Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and   Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed   ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are   carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.   A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided   which delineates all required criteria. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and   sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.     A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is   provided which delineates all required criteria. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and   sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of   the time.     Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is   brief and not descriptive. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and   sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79%   of the time.     Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off   topic. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and   sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less   than 60% of the time.     No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.   Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct   grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (one   or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several   (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (five   or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the   reader’s understanding.   Written Expression and Formatting—The paper follows correct   APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins,   indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations,   and reference list. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA   format with no errors. Course Readings Crabtree, E., Brennan, E., Davis, A., & Coyle, A. (2016). Improving patient care through nursing engagement in evidence-based practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 13(2), 172–175. doi:10.1111/wvn.12126 Kim, S. C., Stichler, J. F., Ecoff, L., Brown, C. E., Gallo, A.-M., & Davidson, J. E. (2016). Predictors of evidence-based practice implementation, job satisfaction, and group cohesion among regional fellowship program participants. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 13(5), 340–348. doi:10.1111/wvn.12171