Week 2 discussion
Choose one of the options below for discussion. Be sure to
elaborate and explain.
Waffles and Workers’ Rights (EEOC v. Waffle House, p. 81)
Read about arbitration law in Chapter 4 and Case 4-3 in your
textbook, and do some online research on the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (EEOC). Then discuss the following:
What is the EEOC’s role in regard to business? Does the
court say that the EEOC trumps the arbitration contract between the employee
and the employer? If so, why? What are the pros and cons of arbitration
agreements? Do you think arbitration agreements between big companies and low
wage earners who are uninformed about the law are truly fair? If you have any
experiences at work with discrimination policies or EEOC trainings, share those
experiences.
Dogs and Dream Therapists (Hagen v. Field, pp. 65 (question
7), and Jones v. Williams, p. 43 (question 9)
Read both cases and discuss legal issues for the court,
focusing on in each. Summarize what factors the court looks at in determining where
a case can be brought. What was the decision in each case, and do you think the
decision was correct? Why or why not?
Week 2 discussion
Choose one of the options below for discussion. Be sure to
elaborate and explain.
Waffles and Workers’ Rights (EEOC v. Waffle House, p. 81)
Read about arbitration law in Chapter 4 and Case 4-3 in your
textbook, and do some online research on the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (EEOC). Then discuss the following:
What is the EEOC’s role in regard to business? Does the
court say that the EEOC trumps the arbitration contract between the employee
and the employer? If so, why? What are the pros and cons of arbitration
agreements? Do you think arbitration agreements between big companies and low
wage earners who are uninformed about the law are truly fair? If you have any
experiences at work with discrimination policies or EEOC trainings, share those
experiences.
Dogs and Dream Therapists (Hagen v. Field, pp. 65 (question
7), and Jones v. Williams, p. 43 (question 9)
Read both cases and discuss legal issues for the court,
focusing on in each. Summarize what factors the court looks at in determining where
a case can be brought. What was the decision in each case, and do you think the
decision was correct? Why or why not?
Week 2 discussion
Choose one of the options below for discussion. Be sure to
elaborate and explain.
Waffles and Workers’ Rights (EEOC v. Waffle House, p. 81)
Read about arbitration law in Chapter 4 and Case 4-3 in your
textbook, and do some online research on the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (EEOC). Then discuss the following:
What is the EEOC’s role in regard to business? Does the
court say that the EEOC trumps the arbitration contract between the employee
and the employer? If so, why? What are the pros and cons of arbitration
agreements? Do you think arbitration agreements between big companies and low
wage earners who are uninformed about the law are truly fair? If you have any
experiences at work with discrimination policies or EEOC trainings, share those
experiences.
Dogs and Dream Therapists (Hagen v. Field, pp. 65 (question
7), and Jones v. Williams, p. 43 (question 9)
Read both cases and discuss legal issues for the court,
focusing on in each. Summarize what factors the court looks at in determining where
a case can be brought. What was the decision in each case, and do you think the
decision was correct? Why or why not?
Week 2 discussion
Choose one of the options below for discussion. Be sure to
elaborate and explain.
Waffles and Workers’ Rights (EEOC v. Waffle House, p. 81)
Read about arbitration law in Chapter 4 and Case 4-3 in your
textbook, and do some online research on the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (EEOC). Then discuss the following:
What is the EEOC’s role in regard to business? Does the
court say that the EEOC trumps the arbitration contract between the employee
and the employer? If so, why? What are the pros and cons of arbitration
agreements? Do you think arbitration agreements between big companies and low
wage earners who are uninformed about the law are truly fair? If you have any
experiences at work with discrimination policies or EEOC trainings, share those
experiences.
Dogs and Dream Therapists (Hagen v. Field, pp. 65 (question
7), and Jones v. Williams, p. 43 (question 9)
Read both cases and discuss legal issues for the court,
focusing on in each. Summarize what factors the court looks at in determining where
a case can be brought. What was the decision in each case, and do you think the
decision was correct? Why or why not?
