TM5102 Leadership and Entrepreneurship in the Service Sector
You are to produce an essay (2000 words) that addresses ONE of the following essay questions.
Leaders can and do make a difference when measuring a company’s success – evaluate and analyse this statement.
Few groups can accomplish much without an individual who acts as an effective leader. The leader can and often does have a significant influence on the group and its direction – evaluate and analyse this statement.
Which leadership skills are needed to successfully cope with the Industry 4.0 organisational requirements?
How can organisations develop leadership in individuals, teams, and organisations?
Remember to be evaluative and critical throughout the essay – make sure you do not just describe, you need to demonstrate that you have read and understood! Industry based examples and case studies need to be included alongside various theories, traits and leadership skills.
|LO1||Understanding how models, theories and concepts about leadership can be used to promote the effectiveness of individuals, groups and organisations.|
|LO2||Developed skills for the analysis of the individual, group and organisational functioning that enhances their effectiveness as leaders|
|LO6||Demonstrate an understanding of the use of creative thinking as a tool of entrepreneurship, enterprise and personal development.|
5th March 2020, 4pm
We strongly suggest that you try to submit all coursework by the deadline set as meeting deadlines will be expected in employment. However, in our regulations, UEL has permitted students to be able to submit their coursework up to 24 hours after the deadline. The deadline is published in this module guide. Coursework which is submitted late, but within 24 hours of the deadline, will be assessed but subjected to a fixed penalty of 5% of the total marks available (as opposed to marks obtained). If you submit twice, once before the deadline and once during the 24 hour late period, then the second submission will be marked and 5% deducted. This rule only applies to coursework. It does not apply to examinations, presentations, performances, practical assessments or viva voce examinations. If you miss these for a genuine reason, then you will need to apply for extenuating circumstances, or accept that you will receive a zero mark.
Further information is available in the Assessment & Feedback Policy at
https://www.uel.ac.uk/Discover/Governance/Policies-Regulations-Corporate-documents/Student-Policies (click on Other Policies)
Does your introduction link to the chosen essay question?
Does your introduction state clear and critical aim and objectives?
Have you provided a background to the industry?
Does the introduction show evidence of knowledge of the industry?
Have you provided a critical analysis and evaluation that addresses interrelated aspects of the chosen topic?
Have you analysed relevant data?
Have you made appropriate use and demonstrated an understanding of relevant theories and frameworks?
Have you linked theories to case study examples?
Have you demonstrated critical evaluation and independent thinking?
Are your arguments well-structured and articulated?
Is there a logical flow to your arguments and the essay as a whole?
|Use of supporting data and evidence
Have you used relevant sources (e.g. journal articles, books, etc.) to back up your arguments?
Have you used a range of reliable sources?
Have you used appropriate citations throughout the text?
Have you re-stated your aim and objectives and summarised the key findings?
Have you provided a critical conclusion that leaves the reader wanting to explore the topic more?
Have you provided an appropriate conclusion to your essay?
Have you identified the key points emerging from your discussion?
Is the assignment well written?
Does the essay follow a clear structure?
Does the assignment adhere to an essay format?
Have you correctly applied Cite Them Right for your citations and reference list?
Is the assignment 2000 words?
In addition to the specific marking criteria for this assignment, general guidelines apply for the expected standard at different levels of study. The following grading standards generally apply to our undergraduate programmes (see Level 6):
|Grade||Level 4||Level 5||Level 6|
(70% or above)
|Thorough understanding of relevant ideas. Clear and well referenced argument. Coherent structure.||Ideas critically analysed. Argument is clear, succinct and well supported. Evidence of a wide range of reading and some independent thought.||Critical work evidencing excellent synthesis and application of ideas. Work is exceptionally well constructed and presented.|
|Sound understanding. Well written and relevant argument. Appropriately referenced.||Critical consideration of relevant ideas. Arguments are precisely defined and appropriately referenced. The work is structurally sound and well written.||Ideas are critically applied and coherently presented. Evidence of wide reading and some originality. Well referenced|
|Evidence of understanding and independent reading. Adequate referencing, but some unsubstantiated material. Weaknesses in spelling, structure & grammar.||Reasonable understanding of the relevant concepts, but some inconsistencies in application. Arguments are referenced, but disjointed. Poor structure, spelling or grammar.||Clear grasp of concepts and some critical application. Appropriately referenced and relevant argument. Reasonable structure and syntax. Well presented|
|Indication of some understanding, but poor application of ideas. Minimal referencing. Generally weak structure.||Generally descriptive work with limited evidence of a critical consideration of ideas. Inadequate referencing. Weaknesses in structure, spelling and grammar.||Evidence of good understanding of issues, but crudely applied. Work indicates some critical thinking, but tends towards description. Argument may be unbalanced. Poor structure and presentation|
|Irrelevant or poorly analysed material. Indication of weak grasp of concepts. Inadequate structure. Poor grammar and spelling.||Uncritical. Poorly referenced. Argument indicates little use of relevant literature. Chaotic structure and generally badly written.||Poorly referenced and suggests inadequate exploration of relevant literature. Chaotic structure and generally badly written.|
As a student you will be taught how to write correctly referenced essays using UEL’s standard Harvard referencing system from Cite Them Right. Cite them Right is the standard Harvard referencing style at UEL. This book will teach you all you need to know about Harvard referencing, plagiarism and collusion. The electronic version of “Cite Them Right: the essential referencing guide” 9th edition, can be accessed whilst on or off campus. The book can only be read online and no part of it can be printed nor downloaded.
Further information is available at:
Your work must be presented in an essay format.
A title page and a reference list must be included.
The title page should contain the title of your essay, the module code and name, your student number and submission deadline.
For late submission please also note if you have or are planning to apply for extenuating circumstances.
Font style: Times New Roman or Arial, Size: 12.
Allow 2.0 line spacing.
The page orientation should be ‘Portrait’ and the layout ‘Justified’.
Pages should be numbered.
Your student number should be included on every page.
Please ensure that your name DOES NOT appear on the script.
This assignment is 2000 words.
Your word count should not include citations and reference lists. You should provide your word count on the front sheet. If your work is significantly shorter, then you will probably have failed to provide the level of detail needed.
Assessment 1 should be submitted to Turnitin by the date and time stated.
The material that you submit to Turnitin will be marked. The Module Leader does not accept hardcopies or assignments via email. You are advised not to submit after 3.00 pm on the due date for your assignment because it could take some time for your submission to upload. The delay could cause the work to be received after 4pm.
Notice is hereby given that all submissions for Component 1 [Essay] of this Module must be submitted to Turnitin. If you fail to submit Component 1 [Essay] to Turnitin, in accordance with the guidance provided on the Virtual Learning Environment (Moodle), a mark of 0 will be awarded for the component.
Turnitin is required for coursework assessments, such as report/research papers or projects in Microsoft Word and in PDF format. There are two main reasons we want you to use Turnitin:
Turnitin can help you avoid academic breaches and plagiarism. When you use Turnitin before a submission deadline, you can use the Originality Report feature to compare your work to thousands of other sources (like websites, Wikipedia, and even other student papers). Anything in your work that identically matches another source is highlighted for you to see. When you use this feature before the deadline, you will have time to revise your work to avoid an instance of academic breach/plagiarism.
Turnitin saves paper. When using Turnitin to electronically submit your work, you will almost never have to submit a paper copy.
UEL has permitted students to be able to submit their coursework up to 24 hours after the deadline. Assessments that are submitted up to 24 hours late are still marked, but with a 5% deduction. However, you have to be very careful when you are submitting your assessment. If you submit your work twice, once using the original deadline link and then again using the late submission link on Turnitin, your assignment will be graded as late with the 5% deduction.
Best advice: Don’t wait until the last minute to submit your assessments electronically. If you experience a problem submitting your work with Turnitin, you should notify your lecturer/tutor by email immediately. However, deadlines are not extended unless there is a significant systems problem with Turnitin. UEL has specific plans in place to address these issues. If UEL finds that the issue with the system was significant, you will receive an email notifying you of the issue and that you have been given a 24 hour extension. If you don’t receive any email that specifically states you have been given an extension, then the original deadline has not been changed.
Feedback will be provided in the following ways:
Class discussions on related topics will allow you to reflect on and revise the content of your work before submission.
You are always welcome to clarify any aspects that are unclear with the Module Leader. However, I will not read multiple drafts of your work – one draft per student.
Submission of the written assignment via Turnitin allows you to check your originality report to avoid plagiarism.
After the assessments have been marked, general feedback for each assessment will be posted on Moodle, and where possible, it will also be presented in class.
Feedback on your work together with your mark will be presented as soon as possible after submission – within three working weeks of the submission deadline.
In order to pass the module, you need to achieve a grade of at least 40% overall, and you need to achieve at least 30% in each assignment.
You will need to retake an assignment if any of the following occur during the semester:
You fail to achieve 30% or more for the assignment.
You fail to achieve 40% for the module and you failed to achieve 40% or more for the assignment.
You will be expected to complete a similar piece of work for your re-assessment. Your assignment brief will be available in Moodle. Re-assessments are normally due in July.
Written by: Lisa Wyld / Karen Gale
Internal Moderation by:
Expert Answer:Word Counts (2116)
How Can Organizations Develop Leadership in Individuals, Teams, And Organizations?
Leadership is an essential trait whose value is felt if it is duly exercised by individuals, teams or organizations. Organizations within which these individuals and teams run errands or undertake assignments will most probably achieve sustainable growth if the leaders mandated as accounting officers or even supervisors manage to experience growth in their leadership traits. It is the responsibility of the organizations to ensure that leadership traits measure up with the emerging trends in the corporate world. There are myriad reasons organizations tend to spend enemas resources, and time in developing leaders. An irrefutable example and assertion is that the organizations that have the highest quality if leaders are by 13 times able to outperform with respect to the key bottom-line metrics. These metrics constitute the quality of products and services offered, customer satisfaction, financial performance and employee engagement. Quite often, there emerges a question on why leadership development is extremely important for organizations that are growth-oriented. In this avenue, quality leadership is a requisite to meeting customer, employee ad investor expectations. Employee, team or organizational growth is often considered a primary responsibility of the human resource unit or department (Glatzhofer 2018). The human resource management function, on the other hand is often subjected to unending constraints which deter the department from performing its functions. This essay purposes to explain the different ways through which the human resource department and the organization’s top management team can promote leadership growth among the individual employees, teams and the organization at large.