Stage 4: System Recommendation & Final System Recommendation Report Paper
Overview
Before you begin work on this assignment, be sure you have read the Case Study, and reviewed the feedback received on your Stage 1, 2 and 3 assignments. Refer to the System Recommendation Report (SRR) Table of Contents below to see where you are in the process of developing this report.
In this Stage 4 assignment, you will identify a certified Electronic Health Records (EHR) system for the Midtown Family Clinic and explain how it meets the requirements, how it will improve the processes at the Clinic, and what needs to be done to implement the system within the Clinic. You will add the Conclusion to the Report. In addition, you will provide a complete final System Recommendation Report incorporating feedback from earlier stages.
BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Table of Contents
F. Summary
D. Improvements from Proposed IT Solution
F. Summary
Conclusion (Stage 4)
References
System Recommendation Report (SRR), Section IV – System Recommendation
Section IV of the System Recommendation Report will propose a certified Electronic Health Record (EHR) system to meet the Midtown Family Clinic’s strategy and meet its operational needs. In Section IV, you will also Identify and explain the improvements the system will bring and the high-level steps that will need to take place in order to implement the system you have proposed. For this assignment, you will add Section IV to Sections I, II and III, as outlined below.
Stage 4 Assignment Instructions
The first step is to incorporate the feedback you received on your Stage 3 assignment, making any needed corrections or adjustments. If you have not incorporated the feedback from your Stage 1 and Stage 2 assignments, you should do so prior to submitting Stage 4. This assignment requires a complete System Recommendation Report document with revisions made as needed based on the Stage 1, 2, and 3 project submissions and feedback. Note: This is a specific grading criteria in the rubric for this assignment.
Using the case study and the outline listed below, develop your Section IV – System Recommendation. Approximate lengths for each section are provided as a guideline; be sure to provide all pertinent information.
First, insert an introductory opening sentence for this section. Then copy the entries for the 10 requirements into the Requirements column from the table in Section I (Stage 1 Assignment). Complete the table by providing the explanations of how the system you selected meets each requirement. (Provide an introductory sentence and copy the table and insert information within.)
Number
(from Functional Requirements table in Section I)
Implementation Strategy – Will the system be implemented on premise or as a cloud-based service? Explain your recommendation for the Midtown Family Practice.
Stage 4: System Recommendation & Final System Recommendation Report Paper
Implementation Considerations:
Conclusion: Close your System Recommendation Report with a brief summary of the key points including the benefits the Midtown Family Clinic can expect to gain from this solution and the alignment with its strategic objectives. This should be a “compelling call to action” to get the Midtown Family Clinic to approve your recommendation and move ahead to implementing the system. (One well-written paragraph.)
NOTE: This final submission should be a cohesive System Recommendation Report for the Midtown Family Clinic. Sections I, II and III should have been updated to reflect substantive feedback received during the grading process. The formatting should be consistent throughout the document, and the writing should flow well from beginning to end. Headings, numbering, page numbers, and footers should be correct for a final submission. A cover/title page should be included with the overall document. The Table of Contents should include the full outline as shown in the graphic in the assignments. The References page should include all references cited in the Report, in alphabetical order and in APA format. Although you prepared this in stages, the final product should not seem to be piecemeal or disconnected.
Formatting Your Assignment
For academic writing, the writer is expected to write in the third person. In third person, the writer avoids the pronouns I, we, my, you, your, and ours. The third person is used to make the writing more objective by taking the individual, the “self,” out of the writing. This method is very helpful for academic writing, a form in which facts, not opinion, drive the tone of the text. Writing in the third person allows the writer to come across as unbiased and thus more informed. The Report is to be written for the Midtown Family Clinic, and reference should not be made by name to individuals who own or work in the Clinic.
Stage 4: System Recommendation & Final System Recommendation Report Paper
EVALUATION CRITERIA/GRADING RUBRIC:
Note: In addition to the criteria for Stage 4, as indicated in the grading rubric, the incorporation of improvements based on substantive feedback (any significant problems with content) from the previous stages will also be evaluated.
Criteria
90-100%
Far Above Standards
80-89%
Above Standards
70-79%
Meets Standards
60-69%
Below Standards
< 60%
Well Below Standards
Possible Points
Provides effective introduction and summary to Section IV; is clear, logical, derived from the Case Study; demonstrates a sophisticated level of writing.
Provides an introduction and summary to Section IV; is clear, logical, and derived from the Case Study. Stage 4: System Recommendation & Final System Recommendation Report Paper
Provides an introduction and summary to Section IV; is adequate, and derived from the Case Study.
Not clear, logical and/or derived from the Case Study. Or, either the introduction or summary is not included.
Not included, or demonstrates little effort.
Identify vendor solution that will improve the processes at the Clinic and aligns with requirements derived from the Case Study
Identified appropriate solution that strongly meets needs of the Clinic; clearly derived from the Case Study; demonstrates sophisticated analysis and writing.
Identified appropriate solution that aligns with needs of the Clinic; clearly derived from the Case Study and demonstrates effective analysis.
Identified possible solution that relates to needs of the Clinic; derived from the Case Study.
Missing IT solution or alignment with needs of the Clinic; and/or are not related to the Case Study, and/or the solution is clearly inappropriate.
Extremely incomplete, or not related to the Case Study.
How the proposed IT solution meets the 10 requirements
Complete, compelling and related to the Case Study; an effective introduction is provided; demonstrates sophisticated analysis and writing.
Complete and related to the Case Study; an effective introduction is provided; demonstrates effective analysis.
Provided and related to the Case Study; an introduction is provided.
Incomplete, inaccurate and/or not related to the Case Study.
Very incomplete, or missing, or many are incorrect.
Strategic goals and improves processes at the Clinic
Clear, complete, strongly related to the Case Study and demonstrates a sophisticated level of writing.
Clear, complete, and related to the Case Study.
Explanations provided.
Incomplete, and/or are not related to the Case Study.
Missing explanations or very minimal effort is shown.
An introduction and all areas (vendor agreement, hardware/ telecom, configuration, testing, employee preparation, data migration, system use, and maintenance)
Clearly and thoroughly included introduction and covered all areas, strongly derived from the Case Study, and demonstrates sophisticated analysis and writing.
Clearly covered and included introduction and all areas, derived from the Case Study, and demonstrates effective analysis and writing.
Covered and included introduction and majority of areas and related to the Case Study.
All areas not covered, and/or are related to the Case Study.
Very incomplete, inaccurate or missing.
Summarizes the SRR and provides a compelling explanation of benefits to be gained
Provides strong, clear and concise summary; appropriately; demonstrates sophisticated analysis and writing.
Provides clear summary; demonstrates effective analysis and writing.
Provides summary.
Lacks sufficient information to provide sufficient summary.
Very incomplete or missing.
Three or more sources–one source from the vendor for the proposed solution, one from within the IFSM 305 course content and one external (other than the course materials)
Three required resources are incorporated and used effectively. Sources used are relevant and timely and contribute strongly to the analysis. References are appropriately incorporated and cited using APA style.
At least three sources are incorporated (vendor, course content and internal) and are relevant and somewhat support the analysis. References are appropriately incorporated and cited using APA style.
Missing vendor resource, and/or less than 3 resources properly incorporated, and/or reference(s) are not cited using APA style.
A source may be used, but is not properly incorporated or used, and/or is not effective or appropriate; and/or does not follow APA style for references and citations.
No course content or external research incorporated; or reference listed is not cited within the text
incorporation of feedback received during the grading process
Document is a very effective and cohesive assemblage of the four sections, is well formatted and flows smoothly from one section to the next.
Document is a good assemblage of the four sections with appropriate formatting and flow.
May be lacking sufficient revisions based on feedback and/or lack a cohesive presentation and flow.
Lack of incorporated feedback, continuity of flow and presentation of final information.
No incorporated feedback and/or not well compiled and presented as a cohesive document.
Very well organized and is easy to read. Very few or no errors in sentence structure, grammar, and spelling; double-spaced, written in third person and presented in a professional format.
Effective organization; has few errors in sentence structure, grammar, and spelling; double-spaced, written in third person and presented in a professional format.
Some organization; may have some errors in sentence structure, grammar and spelling. Report is double spaced and written in third person.
Not well organized, and/or contains several grammar and/or spelling errors; and/or is not double-spaced and written in third person.
Extremely poorly written, has many grammar and/or spelling errors, or does not convey the information.
Stage 4: System Recommendation & Final System Recommendation Report Paper
